Is innovation almost always a recombination of existing ideas, fed by different insights and driven by opposition of the existing (or past) ideas and concepts?
This central question has come up in the discussion and conceptualization I was having about innovation communities of practice I am gearing up; one of the central issues was whether increasing the network around (in) an innovation community will actually not make the discussion items, or topics, more abstract.
This abstraction in my opinion will be inevitable if the number of people that is contributing to the (intellectual) value creation increases, and these people have different backgrounds and insights.
The collective thinking in these innovation communities, can only be facilitated by abstraction of ideas - then taking them away from this state and branching off to further concrete ideas and concepts.
This happened at 12:40:18 AM or

|